Ah, the Test of the Obelisk! What a glorious waste of resources!
What you get from this is...the satisfaction of having built a mucking huge, perhaps decorative (but otherwise useless) monument to the excess of effort. Oh, and you might well pass a Test of Architecture.
Find out more about the details on the page about the test itself. What you're here for is the answer to "what does it take to build one?"
Built: in a small construction site
Skill/Tech required: Must be signed up for the Test of the Obelisk
size | bricks | boards | sulphur | canvas | leather | sap | emeralds |
7 | 231 | 23 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 15 | 0 |
10 | 390 | 40 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 22 | 1 |
20 | 1180 | 120 | 9 | 8 | 28 | 48 | 2 |
40 | 3960 | 400 | 34 | 24 | 106 | 115 | 7 |
80 | 14320 | 1440 | 132 | 80 | 413 | 302 | 20 |
100 | 21900 | 2200 | 205 | 120 | 641 | 422 | 30 |
110 | 26290 | 2640 | 248 | 143 | 774 | 488 | 35 |
120 | 31080 | 3120 | 294 | 168 | 920 | 560 | 40 |
130 | 36270 | 3640 | 344 | 195 | 1077 | 635 | 46 |
170 | 61030 | 6120 | 587 | 323 | 1834 | 982 | 75 |
200 | 83800 | 8400 | 810 | 440 | 2533 | 1288 | 100 |
300 | 185700 | 18600 | 1815 | 960 | 5676 | 2600 | 210 |
I have fitted the data in MATLAB using the Curve Fitting Tool, and obtained the following equations. The resource requirements seem to follow quadratic polynomials, simply with different coefficients, all intersecting at 0. The equations all obtained an adjusted R^2 of ~ 1. The numbers might be very slightly off due to rounding. The equation for sulphur seemed to have the widest possible bounds, perhaps more data is needed. These equations should give a fairly good idea. - Gamaruset
Resource | Equation (x is cubits) | Equation in fractions |
bricks | 2 (x2) + 19 x | 2 x2 + 19 x |
boards | 0.2 (x2) + 2 x | (1/5) x2 + 2 x |
canvas | 0.01 (x2) + 0.2 x | (1/100) x2 + (1/5) x |
emeralds | 0.002 (x2) + 0.1 x | (1/500) x2 + (1/10) x |
leather | 0.0625 (x2) + 0.1625 x | (1/16) x2 + (13/80) x |
sap | 0.0222 (x2) + 2 x | (111/5000) x2 + 2 x |
sulphur | 0.02 (x2) + 0.05 x | (1/50) x2 + (1/20) x |