| Metal | Crystals | Possibles | Notes |
| iron | GC- PS+ TC- YS+ | KS+ | |
| copper | KM- PM- SS- | ||
| tin | KB- RM- YM(3)- | ||
| aluminum | PB- SC+ SC- | ||
| lead | SS+ PS- | GS- | |
| silver | KS(1)+ | ||
| dirt | |||
| limestone | |||
| zinc | PB+ NC+ | GB- GB+ | |
| antimony | |||
| tungsten | |||
| gold | |||
| lithium | AM- RS(1)+ | GC- | |
| strontium | |||
| platinum |
This chart is generated from the Production Chart. The crystals column are for crystals that produce the metal that have been shown to produce only that ore. The possibles are for crystals that have been show to produce more than one type of ore.
Are there any suggestions besides appending a number to the crystal to denot level?
Shadus: What do you do about stones that change across levels?
Darcet: We could put a number after it to indicate the level (ex: GC-1). I don't think that there is a nomenclature declared for that in mining yet. If there is a standard in the mining nomenclature we can use it.
Shadus: Oh there is... It's "(L#)" however in addition to levels how are you going to account for two mines 100 coords apart one producing dirt and one producing iron? I've got GB- for example... it don't make zinc.
Skrug: what about comments on Alloy that are appearing to make sense eg. TB-O is Zinc, and TB-D is Copper (Pheanor-RE). I'm noticing this effect on some stones in some mines....