Laws > Frivilous Ban Pretection Act

Introduced by Richter Status: Failed Percentage, 7th Place, 27.372% in Favor

---

Frivolous Ban Pretection Act

Pharaoh,

• Given that some player have become so self-righteous as to presume

they can dictate the behavior of other players and,

• Given that all MMORPGs are by their nature PVPs and,

• Given that some would presume to speak for the will of the people,

• I humbly ask we put it to the test. I propose the following:

1)No DP can bring a petition to ballot to ban a player. This is redundant and demonstrates an unwillingness to do the job they were elected to and an attempt to shirk responsibility for the ban

2)Any ban that is balloted and fails will result in the balloter receiving the proposed ban.

3)No proposed ban can be balloted without valid, documented examples of undesirable behavior by the target and any petition that contains general, unsubstantiated allegations will be disregarded outright regardless of the number of signatures. Valid documentation would be Screen Shots of the offense, chat windows that are incriminating, or logs from chat channels or chests. Proof must be posted in the wiki on a page with the same name as the proposed ban. This will prevent any "Popularity Contest" bans where a very popular player could get an unpopular or unknown player banned for no good reason. [Part 3 is stricken as a physicsveto - screenshots are easy to photoshop, and the other methods all put me in the role of an investigator who's role would be to determine what constitutes "undesireable behavior." -Pharaoh]